<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vitj</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Врач и информационные технологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Medical Doctor and Information Technologies</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1811-0193</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2413-5208</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25881/18110193_2024_4_48</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vitj-73</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Методика оценки качества данных электронных медицинских карт</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Methodology for assessing the quality of electronic medical records data</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Андрейченко</surname><given-names>А. Е.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Andreychenko</surname><given-names>A. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.ф.-м.н.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">aandreychenko@webiomed.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кафтанов</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kaftanov</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">akaftanov@webiomed.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гусев</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gusev</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.т.н.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">agusev@webiomed.ai</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ООО «К-СКАЙ»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>K-Skai</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБУ «Центральный научно-исследовательский институт организации и информатизации здравоохранения» Минздрава России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>48</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Андрейченко А.Е., Кафтанов А.Н., Гусев А.В., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Андрейченко А.Е., Кафтанов А.Н., Гусев А.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Andreychenko A.E., Kaftanov A.N., Gusev A.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vit-j.ru/jour/article/view/73">https://www.vit-j.ru/jour/article/view/73</self-uri><abstract><p>Ключевой функциональной возможностью медицинских информационных систем медицинских организаций является ведение электронных медицинских карт (ЭМК), которые играют неотъемлемую роль в современной практике здравоохранения, позволяя медицинским организациям последовательно собирать, систематизировать и предоставлять медицинским работникам доступ к информации о диагностике и лечении пациентов. Несмотря на наличие большого объема накопленных ЭМК и давнюю историю их разработки и развития, современные ЭМК имеют довольно низкое качество собираемой в них клинической информации. В настоящий момент нет рекомендуемого подхода к оценке качества данных ЭМК.Цель. Разработать методику оценки качества данных, содержащихся в ЭМК.Материалы и методы. Были собраны и систематизированы требования к процедуре оценки качества данных ЭМК и расчета индекса качества по итогам такой процедуры. На основе требований была сформирована методика оценки качества данных, для каждого из этапов методики проработаны подходы ее практической реализации и приведены конкретные примеры расчетов критериев качества для самых распространенных базовых элементов ЭМК.Результаты. В работе представлена методика оценки качества данных ЭМК, а также алгоритм расчета итоговых индексов качества на основе данных платформы Webiomed. Методика позволяет получить не только интегральную оценку качества, но и ее составляющие, оценивающие разные параметры качества данных, а также детализировать оценку качества по разным элементам ЭМК.Заключение. Разработанная методика позволяет оценить базовые элементы ЭМК. Также предлагаемая методика предоставляет подход и алгоритм расширения на любые дополнительные элементы ЭМК</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Background. The key functionality of the medical information system (MIS) is the maintenance of electronic medical records (EMR), which play an integral role in modern healthcare practice, allowing medical organizations to consistently collect, systematize and provide medical professionals with access to information on the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Despite the existence of a large volume of accumulated EMRs and a long history of their design and development, modern EMRs have a rather low quality of clinical information collected in them. Currently, there is no recommended approach to assessing the quality of EMR data.Objective. To develop a methodology for assessing the quality of data contained in EMRs.Materials and methods. Requirements for the procedure of EMR data quality assessment and calculation of the quality index based on the results of such procedure were collected and systematized. Based on the requirements, a methodology for data quality assessment was formed, approaches to its practical implementation were worked out for each stage of the methodology and specific examples of quality criteria calculations for the most common basic elements of EMC were given. Results. The paper presents a methodology for assessing the quality of EMR data, as well as an algorithm for calculating the final quality indices based on the Webiomed platform data. The methodology allows us to obtain not only an integral quality assessment, but also its components assessing different data quality parameters, as well as to detail the quality assessment for different EHRs elements.Conclusion. The developed methodology allows to evaluate the basic elements of the EHRs. The proposed methodology also provides an approach and an algorithm for extending to any additional element of the EHRs</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>методика</kwd><kwd>электронная медицинская карта</kwd><kwd>ЭМК</kwd><kwd>качество данных</kwd><kwd>оценка качества данных</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>methodology</kwd><kwd>electronic health record</kwd><kwd>EHR</kwd><kwd>data quality</kwd><kwd>data quality assessment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гусев А.В., Владзимирский А.В., Голубев Н.А., Зарубина Т.В. Информатизация здравоохранения Российской Федерации: история и результаты развития // Национальное здравоохранение. — 2021. — №2(3). — С.5-17. doi: 10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.3.5-17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gusev AV, Vladzimirskij AV, Golubev NA, Zarubina TV. Informatizaciya zdravoohraneniya Rossijskoj Federacii: istoriya i rezul'taty razvitiya. Nacional'noe zdravoohranenie. 2021; 2(3): 5-17. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.3.5-17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гусев А.В., Зингерман Б.В., Тюфилин Д.С., Зинченко В.В. Электронные медицинские карты как источник данных реальной клинической практики. Реальная клиническая практика: данные и доказательства. — 2022. — №2(2). — С.8-20. doi: 10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gusev AV, Zingerman BV, Tyufilin DS, Zinchenko V.V. Elektronnye medicinskie karty kak istochnik dannyh real'noj klinicheskoj praktiki. Real'naya klinicheskaya praktika: dannye i dokazatel'stva. 2022; 2(2): 8-20. (In Russ.) doi: 10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnson SG, Speedie S, Simon G, Kumar V, Westra BL. A Data Quality Ontology for the Secondary Use of EHR Data. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015; 2015: 1937-46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnson SG, Speedie S, Simon G, Kumar V, Westra BL. A Data Quality Ontology for the Secondary Use of EHR Data. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015; 2015: 1937-46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnson SG, Pruinelli L, Hoff A, Kumar V, Simon GJ, Steinbach M, Westra BL. A Framework for Visualizing Data Quality for Predictive Models and Clinical Quality Measures. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019; 2019: 630-638.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnson SG, Pruinelli L, Hoff A, Kumar V, Simon GJ, Steinbach M, Westra BL. A Framework for Visualizing Data Quality for Predictive Models and Clinical Quality Measures. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019; 2019: 630-638.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhou J, Hao J, Tang M, Sun H, Wang J, Li J, Qian Q. Development of a quantitative index system for evaluating the quality of electronic medical records in disease risk intelligent prediction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1): 178. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02533-z.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhou J, Hao J, Tang M, Sun H, Wang J, Li J, Qian Q. Development of a quantitative index system for evaluating the quality of electronic medical records in disease risk intelligent prediction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1): 178. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02533-z.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weiskopf NG, Weng C. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: Enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2013. 20(1): 144-151.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weiskopf NG, Weng C. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: Enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2013. 20(1): 144-151.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahn MG, et al. A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016; 4(1): 1244.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahn MG, et al. A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016; 4(1): 1244.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кафтанов А.Н., Андрейченко А.Е., Гусев А.В. Обзор методических подходов к оценке качества ведения электронных медицинских карт // Врач и информационные технологии. — 2024. — №3. — С.6-19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaftanov AN, Andrejchenko AE, Gusev AV. Obzor metodicheskih podhodov k ocenke kachestva vedeniya elektronnyh medicinskih kart. Vrach i informacionnye tekhnologii. 2024; 3: 6-19. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
